<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Publish Negative Content. Ever.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dont-publish-negative-content</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: isemann</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11614</link>
		<dc:creator>isemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 19:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-11614</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a character that Harry Enfield does where he can&#039;t back down from an argument. It&#039;s superb and I trawled like mad on YouTube and Google to find a clip but couldn&#039;t find one anywhere.

The only place I could find a mention was on Wikipedia here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_%26_Paul (search for back down).

Don&#039;t know why but this post put me in mind of him.

R!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a character that Harry Enfield does where he can&#8217;t back down from an argument. It&#8217;s superb and I trawled like mad on YouTube and Google to find a clip but couldn&#8217;t find one anywhere.</p>
<p>The only place I could find a mention was on Wikipedia here &#8211; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_%26_Paul" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_%26_Paul</a> (search for back down).</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know why but this post put me in mind of him.</p>
<p>R!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Liked your post. It is summed up nicely in this facebook status: http://imgur.com/6zjNO.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liked your post. It is summed up nicely in this facebook status: <a href="http://imgur.com/6zjNO.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://imgur.com/6zjNO.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-634</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re so right. I am trying hard to ensure that I am not negative in my actions online (and off). If I have a grouch then I either take ten and a nice bar of chocolate or write about it somewhere where no-one will ever see it - writing is very cathartic for me.

Well written post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re so right. I am trying hard to ensure that I am not negative in my actions online (and off). If I have a grouch then I either take ten and a nice bar of chocolate or write about it somewhere where no-one will ever see it &#8211; writing is very cathartic for me.</p>
<p>Well written post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver Firefly</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Silver Firefly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Glad you see the connection between negativity and ego. It&#039;s a good article you&#039;ve written and good advice.

I&#039;ve been guilty of being aggressive and engaging in flame wars (several years ago I was an angrier person and a lot more negative than what I am now). But over the last couple of years I&#039;ve done more to become more positive and less aggressive, and consequently I&#039;ve stayed out of flame wars etc most of the time.

It&#039;s important that people realise that others are entitled to their opinion. They are also entitled to voice their opinion online without being ripped to pieces for it. It&#039;s also important that folks realise that opinions shouldn&#039;t be taken personally. It&#039;s the facts that should be taken more seriously. Two excellent books on the subject of ego, opinions and negativity, and how they can be dealt with: A Voice of Knowledge (Miguel Ruiz) and The Power of Now (Eckhart Tolle).

So, remember the disagreement we had on Twitter where you blocked me? :p

Looking forward to seeing your new design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you see the connection between negativity and ego. It&#8217;s a good article you&#8217;ve written and good advice.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been guilty of being aggressive and engaging in flame wars (several years ago I was an angrier person and a lot more negative than what I am now). But over the last couple of years I&#8217;ve done more to become more positive and less aggressive, and consequently I&#8217;ve stayed out of flame wars etc most of the time.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important that people realise that others are entitled to their opinion. They are also entitled to voice their opinion online without being ripped to pieces for it. It&#8217;s also important that folks realise that opinions shouldn&#8217;t be taken personally. It&#8217;s the facts that should be taken more seriously. Two excellent books on the subject of ego, opinions and negativity, and how they can be dealt with: A Voice of Knowledge (Miguel Ruiz) and The Power of Now (Eckhart Tolle).</p>
<p>So, remember the disagreement we had on Twitter where you blocked me? :p</p>
<p>Looking forward to seeing your new design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-627</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right -- a post on the topic from a different point of view: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.rebeccahaden.com/2009/05/is-being-nice-unfair-advantage-for.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Is Being Nice an Unfair Advantage for SEO?&quot;&lt;/a&gt; 

Venomous comments can start a lively discussion and bring traffic, and I guess many of us enjoy razor-like wit at a distance, but you&#039;ve got to wonder how potential clients respond to it. I figure they imagine what it would be like to work with a hot-headed designer and go elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right &#8212; a post on the topic from a different point of view: <a href="http://blog.rebeccahaden.com/2009/05/is-being-nice-unfair-advantage-for.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Is Being Nice an Unfair Advantage for SEO?&#8221;</a> </p>
<p>Venomous comments can start a lively discussion and bring traffic, and I guess many of us enjoy razor-like wit at a distance, but you&#8217;ve got to wonder how potential clients respond to it. I figure they imagine what it would be like to work with a hot-headed designer and go elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting :)
It is a big balancing act for sure, and yeah even the &quot;big boys&quot; knock heads on a pretty regular basis as you mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting :)<br />
It is a big balancing act for sure, and yeah even the &#8220;big boys&#8221; knock heads on a pretty regular basis as you mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-564</guid>
		<description>Man, this is an epic ballancing act. You want to disagree with authors when they publish content that is wrong but you don&#039;t want to make yourself out to be a total arse hole.

I like to think I can be quite restrained but I am guilty of being baited into arguments online on occasion. I don&#039;t particularly like doing it but it all depands on how strongly I feel about the post in question.

I&#039;ve been a member/moderator on a few web design forums for years now and have settled into the role of Simon Cowell when it comes to critiquing members&#039; sites. This is a stance that most members appreciate. I&#039;m direct and I don&#039;t sugar-coat things and I think that is beneficial. You do get the odd member, however who thinks I&#039;m personally insulting them and proceeds to start a flame-war with me.. or at least attempts to. To them I simply say &quot;That&#039;s my advice, take it or leave it.&quot; and post no further comments. 

Negativity lies, largely in the eye of the beholder, though. Look at the recent spat between Sam Brown and Ryan Carson. Sam spotted a UX and accessibility flaw with the new 37 signals site and blogged it, along with a solution in a light-hearted, funny way. Ryan Carson, upon seeing this proceeded to go on the war-path on thinkvitamin.com calling the comments &quot;smug&quot; and &quot;elitist&quot; - an over-reaction to say the least.

Goes to show, you can&#039;t please everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, this is an epic ballancing act. You want to disagree with authors when they publish content that is wrong but you don&#8217;t want to make yourself out to be a total arse hole.</p>
<p>I like to think I can be quite restrained but I am guilty of being baited into arguments online on occasion. I don&#8217;t particularly like doing it but it all depands on how strongly I feel about the post in question.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a member/moderator on a few web design forums for years now and have settled into the role of Simon Cowell when it comes to critiquing members&#8217; sites. This is a stance that most members appreciate. I&#8217;m direct and I don&#8217;t sugar-coat things and I think that is beneficial. You do get the odd member, however who thinks I&#8217;m personally insulting them and proceeds to start a flame-war with me.. or at least attempts to. To them I simply say &#8220;That&#8217;s my advice, take it or leave it.&#8221; and post no further comments. </p>
<p>Negativity lies, largely in the eye of the beholder, though. Look at the recent spat between Sam Brown and Ryan Carson. Sam spotted a UX and accessibility flaw with the new 37 signals site and blogged it, along with a solution in a light-hearted, funny way. Ryan Carson, upon seeing this proceeded to go on the war-path on thinkvitamin.com calling the comments &#8220;smug&#8221; and &#8220;elitist&#8221; &#8211; an over-reaction to say the least.</p>
<p>Goes to show, you can&#8217;t please everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun J</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 06:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-562</guid>
		<description>Very insightful and thought provoking. Great example too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very insightful and thought provoking. Great example too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ansel Taft</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Ansel Taft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-561</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re an idiot.

Just kidding! ...It was a good article. And a good reminder for someone like me: fast-fingered, a sense of humor dripping with sarcasm and a venomous tongue. I believe I could start a flame war on the hour, every hour, if needed. Now if only I could come up with a design to use it for good and bring some extra cheddar in the family door?

Hmmmmmmmmm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re an idiot.</p>
<p>Just kidding! &#8230;It was a good article. And a good reminder for someone like me: fast-fingered, a sense of humor dripping with sarcasm and a venomous tongue. I believe I could start a flame war on the hour, every hour, if needed. Now if only I could come up with a design to use it for good and bring some extra cheddar in the family door?</p>
<p>Hmmmmmmmmm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chester</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-558</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure the guy responding to Japh was none other that Christian Bale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure the guy responding to Japh was none other that Christian Bale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 09:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-556</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t heard that guy&#039;s response to Japh&#039;s AudioBoo til just now. What an amazing ineffective and internet-badboy spiel! Wonderful example for your post and your advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard that guy&#8217;s response to Japh&#8217;s AudioBoo til just now. What an amazing ineffective and internet-badboy spiel! Wonderful example for your post and your advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spaceface</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>spaceface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 14:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-555</guid>
		<description>I can honestly say I have never experienced &#039;internet rage&#039;, I guess I was born kinda zen-like hehe :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can honestly say I have never experienced &#8216;internet rage&#8217;, I guess I was born kinda zen-like hehe :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 12:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-554</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe, thanks so much for pointing that out - I&#039;ve got a new design coming in the next month or so and I&#039;ll make sure that issue is addressed! But just for the record the first is at the top and the last (most recent) is always at the bottom :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe, thanks so much for pointing that out &#8211; I&#8217;ve got a new design coming in the next month or so and I&#8217;ll make sure that issue is addressed! But just for the record the first is at the top and the last (most recent) is always at the bottom :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wizely</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Wizely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 11:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-553</guid>
		<description>I remember a couple of &#039;flame-grilled&#039; debates with you a while ago on a forum - but we sorted that out quickly enough (I hope!) with some editing of posts after talking it through.
I like this article and think it&#039;s great advice - what I try to do when someone comes in from left field and gets a bit personal (rather than debating the issue) is:
1. Ignore the inflammatory stuff completely
2. Don&#039;t retaliate in any way
3. Get right back onto the topic in hand and follow-up by citing independent/ respected sources.
Of course, it&#039;s harder said than done! I&#039;m totally gob-smacked at that last AudioBoo - reminds me of Micheal Caine&#039;s irrational/ out-there loathing of the Dutch in Goldmember - totally random!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a couple of &#8216;flame-grilled&#8217; debates with you a while ago on a forum &#8211; but we sorted that out quickly enough (I hope!) with some editing of posts after talking it through.<br />
I like this article and think it&#8217;s great advice &#8211; what I try to do when someone comes in from left field and gets a bit personal (rather than debating the issue) is:<br />
1. Ignore the inflammatory stuff completely<br />
2. Don&#8217;t retaliate in any way<br />
3. Get right back onto the topic in hand and follow-up by citing independent/ respected sources.<br />
Of course, it&#8217;s harder said than done! I&#8217;m totally gob-smacked at that last AudioBoo &#8211; reminds me of Micheal Caine&#8217;s irrational/ out-there loathing of the Dutch in Goldmember &#8211; totally random!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 11:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

Note on usability on your comments. I can not see the order of the comments. Since now they all have the same date. So which is first (or last)? So for usability i would suggest a number or the time.

cheers,
joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Note on usability on your comments. I can not see the order of the comments. Since now they all have the same date. So which is first (or last)? So for usability i would suggest a number or the time.</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Michael-MacGregor</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Michael-MacGregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 11:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Good article John, the internet is very VERY unforgiving of those wee slip-ups where we let our emotions get the best of us and we write exactly what we think at the time.
This is not a problem in the real world as its a moment in time that fades away, but in the virtual world it is archived, copied, commented on and searchable by everybody including clients!

My tip is whether your writing an email to a problem client, posting on a forum and the most dangerous of all tweeting on Twitter, is to write what you want to send, then before sending it &#039;out there&#039; take a breather! - go make a coffee, walk the dog, feed the fish, than come back and review what you have written with a cool head.
That way you can save yourself a whole lot of trouble!

On a funnier side this is an amusing take of how quickly &#039;Flame Wars&#039; start from Collage Humour: http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1907543</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article John, the internet is very VERY unforgiving of those wee slip-ups where we let our emotions get the best of us and we write exactly what we think at the time.<br />
This is not a problem in the real world as its a moment in time that fades away, but in the virtual world it is archived, copied, commented on and searchable by everybody including clients!</p>
<p>My tip is whether your writing an email to a problem client, posting on a forum and the most dangerous of all tweeting on Twitter, is to write what you want to send, then before sending it &#8216;out there&#8217; take a breather! &#8211; go make a coffee, walk the dog, feed the fish, than come back and review what you have written with a cool head.<br />
That way you can save yourself a whole lot of trouble!</p>
<p>On a funnier side this is an amusing take of how quickly &#8216;Flame Wars&#8217; start from Collage Humour: <a href="http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1907543" rel="nofollow">http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1907543</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack F</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 10:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Oh what a crap article you stupid author! Haha.

JUst kidding, nice article, agree with everything you said, I think we have all made mistakes with negative articles/comments but as long as we can learn from them and move on it&#039;s all good.

Nice article John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh what a crap article you stupid author! Haha.</p>
<p>JUst kidding, nice article, agree with everything you said, I think we have all made mistakes with negative articles/comments but as long as we can learn from them and move on it&#8217;s all good.</p>
<p>Nice article John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 10:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-549</guid>
		<description>hahaha that last guy is fantastic! I&#039;m assuming he somehow randomly came across Japh&#039;s post and obviously had nothing better to do with his time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha that last guy is fantastic! I&#8217;m assuming he somehow randomly came across Japh&#8217;s post and obviously had nothing better to do with his time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Japh</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Japh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Really great reflective post, John.  I&#039;m flattered to have featured in it too!  I do usually try to keep a level head about me, but I&#039;ve had my share of not so well thought out responses too  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great reflective post, John.  I&#8217;m flattered to have featured in it too!  I do usually try to keep a level head about me, but I&#8217;ve had my share of not so well thought out responses too  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Haha. Typical Onwired guys so negative. :P I kid I kid. 

Great article! Very true. Your example really hit home as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. Typical Onwired guys so negative. :P I kid I kid. </p>
<p>Great article! Very true. Your example really hit home as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-546</guid>
		<description>lmao - thanks Tony! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lmao &#8211; thanks Tony! :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chester</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-545</guid>
		<description>John -- You really need to stop writing these ridiculously stupid blog posts. How about an article that&#039;s actually useful for once?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8212; You really need to stop writing these ridiculously stupid blog posts. How about an article that&#8217;s actually useful for once?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lkayART</title>
		<link>http://john.onolan.org/dont-publish-negative-content/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>lkayART</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.onolan.org/?p=406#comment-544</guid>
		<description>I totally diagree with you.
Nah just kiddig ;&gt; It coulden make more sens, good article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally diagree with you.<br />
Nah just kiddig ;&gt; It coulden make more sens, good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/33 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 762/774 objects using disk: basic

Served from: john.onolan.org @ 2012-02-04 15:34:10 -->
